FRITSCH Clémentine's profile
avatar

FRITSCH ClémentineORCID_LOGO

  • UMR 6249 Chrono-environnement, CNRS, Besançon, France
  • Bioaccumulation/biomagnification, Biomonitoring, Environmental pollution, Terrestrial ecotoxicology

Recommendations:  0

Review:  1

Areas of expertise
wildlife toxicology, landscape ecotoxicology, trophic ecotoxicology, current-use pesticides, trace metals

Review:  1

24 Mar 2023
article picture

Identifying pesticide mixtures at country-wide scale

An original approach for the identification of relevant pesticides mixtures at nationwide scale 

Recommended by based on reviews by Patrice Couture and Clémentine FRITSCH

Over the last decades, pesticides have been massively used in agriculture and their impacts on both the environment and human health are a major growing concern (Humann-Guilleminot et al., 2019; 2019 Boedeker et al., 2020). Improving the prediction of wildlife exposure to pesticides and the associated impacts on ecosystems is therefore crucial. In general, ecotoxicological studies addressing the effects of pesticides include compounds that are selected based on general use over large areas (e.g. regions, country) or specific crop types. Such a selection does not necessarily reflect the mixtures to which species of wildlife are exposed in a particular ecosystem.

In this context, Cairo et al. (2023) present an original approach to identify relevant mixtures of current-use pesticides. Their approach relies on public data concerning pesticide sales and cropping, available at a nationwide scale in France and at a relatively high resolution (i.e. postcode of the buyer). Based on a number of clearly exposed and discussed assumptions (e.g. “pesticides were used in the year of purchase and in the postcode of purchase”), their approach allowed for identifying 18 groups that were discriminated by a reduced number of pesticides. Some compounds were found in most or all groups and were termed “core substances” (e.g. deltamethrin and lambda-cyhalothrin). Other compounds, however, were associated with a limited number of groups and termed “discriminant substances” (e.g. boscalid and epoxiconazole).

The authors identified groups of molecules that are probably associated with the same mixtures, which warrants the investigation of potential synergetic effects. In addition, their approach allowed for the identification of areas where aquatic biota may be exposed to similar mixtures, which is might prove of interest to further investigate in situ the actual impacts of pesticide mixtures on ecosystems. Note that the approach taken by the authors might be applied by others in other countries, provided a database of pesticide sales is available.

REFERENCES

Boedeker W, Watts M, Clausing P, Marquez E (2020) The global distribution of acute unintentional pesticide poisoning: estimations based on a systematic review. BMC Public Health, 20, 1875. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09939-0

Cairo M, Monnet A-C, Robin S, Porcher E, Fontaine C (2023) Identifying pesticide mixtures at country-wide scale. HAL, ver. 2 peer-reviewed and recommended by Peer Community in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Chemistry. https://hal.science/hal-03815557

Humann-Guilleminot S, Tassin de Montaigu C, Sire J, Grünig S, Gning O, Glauser G, Vallat A, Helfenstein F (2019) A sublethal dose of the neonicotinoid insecticide acetamiprid reduces sperm density in a songbird. Environmental Research, 177, 108589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108589

avatar

FRITSCH ClémentineORCID_LOGO

  • UMR 6249 Chrono-environnement, CNRS, Besançon, France
  • Bioaccumulation/biomagnification, Biomonitoring, Environmental pollution, Terrestrial ecotoxicology

Recommendations:  0

Review:  1

Areas of expertise
wildlife toxicology, landscape ecotoxicology, trophic ecotoxicology, current-use pesticides, trace metals